Comparing Emsculpt and Coolsculpting: Which is More Effective?

When it comes to body contouring, both Emsculpt and Coolsculpting are excellent treatments. Learn more about how they differ and which one is more effective.

Comparing Emsculpt and Coolsculpting: Which is More Effective?

When it comes to body contouring, both Emsculpt and Coolsculpting are excellent treatments. However, each of them excels in different aspects. On one hand, CoolSculpting is great for reducing fat and thinning areas you may be self-conscious about. On the other hand, EMSculpt builds muscle and tones the body.

CoolSculpting uses cold to achieve its result, while EMSculpt uses electromagnetic energy. CoolSculpting can be used on more parts of the body than EmSculpt. In terms of fat reduction, EMSculpt produces an average 19% reduction in fat stores after 2 to 4 weeks after treatment, which is slightly less than CoolSculpting. However, it excels when it comes to building muscle, with patients achieving an average 16% increase in muscle mass in their target treatment areas.

CoolSculpting treatments will only reduce fat, while Emsculpt treatments tone muscles and burn unwanted fat. Therefore, Emsculpt is the best choice for those who don't have much excess fat in the target area and want more definition. Coolsculpting results are permanent if you maintain your weight, while Emsculpt is a treatment you'll want to repeat to maintain results. Many patients looking for a complete transformation of their appearance combine Emsculpt with CoolSculpting for best results.

One of the best things about EmSculpt is that you can quickly get to the body of your dreams with it. So if you're looking for a way to tone your muscles and reduce fat at the same time, then Emsculpt may be the right choice for you.

Gary Casoria
Gary Casoria

Incurable internet evangelist. Infuriatingly humble internet fanatic. Musicaholic. Extreme internet specialist. Typical social media lover. Proud social media guru.